The 19th Century public, surrounded by the offensive ugliness of the industrial revolution, was quicker to respond to paintings of everyday, bucolic rural scenes. Country landscapes became a common and popular subject for watercolorists, and painters no longer had to add a Greek nymph to every scene to have it accepted in the Academy show.The romantic view of where we come from and what we were and the urge to record it in paint is understandable. Our contemporary world seems less inspiring. Certainly a dilapidated barn in the countryside seems to have more character than that new condominium down the street. But few of us today have much personal involvement with rusting farm equipment or rural life. To even find such subjects requires several hours of driving through heavy traffic. Rural subjects seem inviting and appropriate, mostly because they’re traditional. They’re what watercolorists are supposed to paint, what they’ve always painted.
Painting, at least in the Western world, is not based on tradition. It is a form of personal expression: the artist’s thoughts, feelings, and reactions to the world that surrounds him. Although we all on occasion can suffer from bouts of nostalgia, putting those feelings in paint will not produce great art. Remember, most of the landscape watercolorists from the past that we admire Turner, Whistler, Cezanne, Homer, Sargent, Hopper, Burchfield, and Marin were painting their contemporary world in a new and creative way.
|